Legal Opinion

Stoll v. COLL. OF VETERINARY

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

94 N.Y.2d 162 (1999)

723 N.E.2d 65

701 N.Y.S.2d 316

In the Matter of DAVID A. STOLL, as Attorney for JAMES B. MAAS, Respondent,

v.

NEW YORK STATE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 19, 1999.

Decided November 23, 1999.

James J. Mingle, Ithaca, Nelson E. Roth, Michael G. Kimberly and Patricia A. McClary for appellants.

David A. Stoll, New York City, pro se, and Center for Individual Rights, Washington D.C. (Michael E. Rosman of counsel), for respondent.

Judges BELLACOSA, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Capital Newspapers v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Encore College Bookstores, Inc. v. Auxiliary Service Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Daily Gazette Co. v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Russo v. Nassau County Community CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API