Legal Opinion

Hrovat v. Cleveland Ry. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1932No. 23010PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

In an error proceeding where the entire record is before the reviewing court, and an unsuccessful litigant seeks final judgment in his favor upon the uncontroverted facts, is a cross-petition in error necessary for that purpose? This court has sanctioned the rule that a final judgment may be rendered in a higher court in favor of the defendant in error without the necessity of filing a cross-petition for that purpose. In the following cases it does not appear that any cross-petition in error was filed by the defendant in error in the appellate court, or in this court, in his attempt to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buell v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Krieger's Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Riley v. McNicolOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. RegisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Hyman Reiver and Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  4. Parfet v. Kansas City Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Sweet v. Clare-Mar Camp, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API