Legal Opinion

Hyman Reiver and Company v. Rose

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 23, 1958No. 26, 1958PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.:

This appeal relates (1) to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a judgment for plaintiff for commissions alleged to be due by defendant to plaintiff; (2) to the refusal of the trial judge to charge the jury with respect to a fraud alleged to have been committed by plaintiff in computing his commission; (3) to the failure of the trial judge to inform counsel of the receipt of a note from the jury prior to giving the jury supplementary instructions in response to the information contained in the note; and (4) to the supplementary charge itself in the light of the information…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. People v. . FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  2. Fensterer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Boatson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Sherman v. Del. Dep't of Pub. SafetySupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API