Legal Opinion

Landmark Bank v. Ciaravino

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1988No. 53268PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

This case reaches the writer on reassignment. We have utilized, without quotation marks, portions of the original opinion which failed of adoption.

Landmark Bank appeals a judgment which granted some, but not all relief requested in its suit for equitable subrogation and to determine priorities among holders on notes secured by deeds of trust on a residence. Landmark also asked the court to set aside a foreclosure sale or, in the alternative, to require an accounting of the proceeds of the sale. The contest is between lienholders. It does not involve the borrower.

Solely for the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anison v. RiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Bunn v. LindsaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Munday v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Petring v. KuhsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Baker v. Farmers' Bank of ConwayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lamb Excavation, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Houston v. Bank of America Federal Savings BankNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kansas City Downtown Minority Development Corp. v. Corrigan Associates Ltd. PartnershipMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Messner v. American Union Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Metmor Financial, Inc. v. Landoll Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API