Legal Opinion

United States v. Hummingway

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2006No. 05-10001; D.C. No. CR-00-00470-DFLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Princeton Hummingway appeals a second sentence following an earlier appeal of a conviction on twelve counts of violating of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. After being fully informed on the Faretta case, Humming-way chose to represent himself on trial, and after being fully informed of the consequences, refused to participate in his sentencing.

In his first appeal, we affirmed the district court’s decision to allow Humming-way to represent himself, but reversed his first sentence in light of Ameline I. United States v. Hummingway, 111 Fed. Appx. 879 (9th Cir.2004).

Although Hummingway was serving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Lee Arnold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Frank Lynn Brewer v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. HummingwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API