United States v. Hummingway
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Princeton Hummingway appeals his conviction and sentence, after a jury trial, for twelve counts of mail fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Hummingway contends that the district court erred when it permitted him to waive his right to counsel without a full competency hearing and that the district court did not properly warn him of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. Hummingway challenges the district court’s time restrictions on cross-examination of government witnesses.
Hummingway challenges his sentence, contending that the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BENSIMON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Richard MohawkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hummingway, AKA Goldenstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. HummingwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006