Legal Opinion

United States v. Hummingway

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 29, 2004No. 03-10050; D.C. No. CR-00-00470-ALLPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Princeton Hummingway appeals his conviction and sentence, after a jury trial, for twelve counts of mail fraud and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Hummingway contends that the district court erred when it permitted him to waive his right to counsel without a full competency hearing and that the district court did not properly warn him of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation. Hummingway challenges the district court’s time restrictions on cross-examination of government witnesses.

Hummingway challenges his sentence, contending that the district…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Freddie J. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BENSIMON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Richard MohawkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hummingway, AKA Goldenstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. HummingwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API