Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Mertz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 5, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The only ground of error claimed in this appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in an action for damages resulting from an automobile collision, is that the amount of the judgment is excessive. The plaintiff, who was about thirty years of age, was thrown from the car he was operating to the pavement and suffered severe lacerations about his head, face and hands, a considerable shock, and the pain consequent upon his injuries and their treatment. He was confined to the hospital for two weeks and thereafter, except for brief trips to see his doctor, for eight weeks to the house where he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sizer v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Kuczon v. TomkieviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Horsfall v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Belsky v. SheronasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Rusch v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. Squires v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Adams v. Mohican HotelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Sadonis v. GovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API