Legal Opinion

Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Davis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 4, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The writ of error brings for review a judgment for peremptory writ of mandamus requiring plaintiffs in error, the respondents in the court below, as follows:

“Forthwith to convene and pass any and all instruments and resolutions necessary to authorize the payment to the relator of his past due coupons in the amount of $5,500.00, described in the alternative writ as amended, to-wit, interest coupons of series 15, 16, 17 and 18, which matured March 1st, 1933, September 1, 1933, March 1, 1934, and September 1, 1934, each in the amount of $27.50 of County of Hernando Road Bonds numbered 170 to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  2. State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Rountree v. State Ex Rel. Georgia Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Coen v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  4. Town of Columbus v. BarringerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  5. Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API