Legal Opinion
Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Davis
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 4, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The writ of error brings for review a judgment for peremptory writ of mandamus requiring plaintiffs in error, the respondents in the court below, as follows:
“Forthwith to convene and pass any and all instruments and resolutions necessary to authorize the payment to the relator of his past due coupons in the amount of $5,500.00, described in the alternative writ as amended, to-wit, interest coupons of series 15, 16, 17 and 18, which matured March 1st, 1933, September 1, 1933, March 1, 1934, and September 1, 1934, each in the amount of $27.50 of County of Hernando Road Bonds numbered 170 to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Rountree v. State Ex Rel. Georgia Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Coen v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. QuiggSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Bessemer Coal, Iron & Land Co. v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Town of Columbus v. BarringerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.