Legal Opinion

Bohannon v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 2, 1958No. Gen. 47,101, 47,102PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court adopts the following opinion, written by

JUSTICE FEPNBEBU,

as the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff brought this action against Charles P. Lind and the corporate defendants, Industrial Maintenance, Inc., Joseph T. Eyerson and Son, Inc., and Universal Fabricated Products Co., Inc., to whom we shall refer as Industrial, Eyerson and Universal, respectively. Before trial, the court dismissed the action against Lind and Industrial upon their motion, on the ground that plaintiff was confined to the remedies against them under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Upon the trial of the cause there was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Skala v. LehonIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. Roberts & Schaefer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  4. Chicago Railways Co. v. R. F. Conway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moroni v. Intrusion-Prepakt, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  2. Miller v. DeWittAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Spivack v. HaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  4. Yankey v. Oscar Bohlin & Son, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Sack v. Arcole Midwest Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API