Legal Opinion

Henkel v. Winn

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 21, 2001No. 3344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Chief Judge:

In this attorney malpractice action, Nancy Henkel (Wife) alleges that Marshall Winn, Lesley R. Moore, and the law firm of Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, P.A., (collectively, Attorneys) were negligent in the preparation of her husband’s will. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Attorneys. We affirm.

FACTS

In November 1995, Robert Head (Husband) and Wife met with Winn to discuss their estate plans and wills. At the time of this meeting, Husband had been diagnosed with terminal metastatic cancer, and Wife was expecting the couple’s first child. Husband had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. McNair v. RainsfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Smith v. HaynsworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Roundtree v. RoundtreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Shelley v. ShelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Hall v. FedorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Sims v. HallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API