Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Martinez-Perez and Edward James Dennis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1991No. 90-8683PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
Daniel Martinez-Perez (Martinez) and Edward Dennis appeal their convictions of conspiracy to possess, and possession of, marihuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
A jury found Dennis, Martinez, and Aldo Olivas-Ruiz guilty of conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute marihuana. The jury also found Martinez guilty of conspiracy to import and importation of marihuana. The appeals of Dennis and Martinez are before us now.
II
Dennis and Martinez argue that their fourth amendment rights were violated when they were arrested and marihuana was…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Kye Soo Lee, Min Ho Chay, and Min Sik LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Anthony Buckhalter and Clarence MastonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Elena HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.