Legal Opinion

Cardionet, LLC v. Scottcare Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Tucker, District Judge.

*446In the present motion, Defendants, The ScottCare Corporation and Ambucor Health Solutions, Inc., ask that the Court grant their Motion for Judgment On The Pleadings Or, In The Alternative, Summary Judgment ("Motion") (Doc. 211) with respect to Plaintiffs' asserted claims of United States Patent Nos. 7,587,237 (the "'237 Patent") and 7,941,207 (the "'207 Patent"). For the reasons set forth more fully below, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, CardioNet, LLC and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC1 (collectively, "Plaintiffs" or…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braemar Manufacturing, LLC v. the Scottcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API