Legal Opinion

United States v. Mary Ann Rounsavall

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1997No. 97-1247PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Mary Ann Rounsavall appeals her twenty-year sentence for drug and money laundering. She contends that the government acted irrationally and/or in bad faith in refusing to file a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) to reduce her sentence below the statutory twenty-year mandatory minimum. We conclude that Rounsavall has made a sufficient threshold showing on two separate grounds to require that this matter be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to determine if, in fact, the government acted irrationally and/or in bad faith.

I

On November 9, 1995,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Melendez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. Lershawn Vincent KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Lori Kay Stockdall, United States of America v. Floyd Eugene StockdallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. AlegriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. James L. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Timothy Dean WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. ShahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. United States v. Gary Lynn MoellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API