Legal Opinion
United States v. Lori Kay Stockdall, United States of America v. Floyd Eugene Stockdall
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1995No. 93-4089PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
Lori Kay Stockdall and Floyd E. Stockdall appeal their sentences for multiple drug, firearm, and money laundering offenses. They contend that the government violated their plea agreements and exceeded its authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) by limiting substantial assistance motions to fewer than all applicable mandatory minimum sentences. We reject the Stockdalls’ principal contentions but conclude that the government may have exceeded its authority under § 3553(e) by basing its motions on factors other than the Stockdalls’ substantial assistance. Accordingly, we remand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Mattie Lou ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Lershawn Vincent KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. Deborah Marie DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. AlegriaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. James L. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Marc David Rabins, United States of America v. A.L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- St. Croix Waterway v. George MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.