Legal Opinion

State v. Jason Ephriam Rowland

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2015No. 42229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELANSON, Chief Judge.

Jason Ephriam Rowland appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he was subjected to a warrantless search of his person during execution of a search warrant for his residence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

After receiving information that controlled substances, drug paraphernalia and stolen property were located at Rowland’s residence, officers obtained a search warrant. One officer entered the basement of the residence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. VivianIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Joseph Michael Stephen, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  3. State of Iowa v. Nathan James EricsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  4. State v. EspinozaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. MillerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API