State v. Jason Ephriam Rowland
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MELANSON, Chief Judge.
Jason Ephriam Rowland appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he was subjected to a warrantless search of his person during execution of a search warrant for his residence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
After receiving information that controlled substances, drug paraphernalia and stolen property were located at Rowland’s residence, officers obtained a search warrant. One officer entered the basement of the residence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. VivianIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Joseph Michael Stephen, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
- State of Iowa v. Nathan James EricsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
- State v. EspinozaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. MillerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020