Legal Opinion

People v. Zambrano

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2004No. E034724PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant appeals from his conviction of selling and transporting cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a)) with one prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)) and one prison prior (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)). He contends that the trial court prejudicially erred by allowing the prosecutor to ask him, on cross-examination, whether two police officers were lying about his involvement in an alleged drug transaction, and that the prosecutor committed misconduct by asking the questions. He argues that the prosecutor’s “were they lying”…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. ChatmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. JohniganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. State v. FosterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. ZurinagaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API