Legal Opinion

In Re Neely

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1993No. S015623PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

While his appeal from a judgment imposing the death penalty was pending before this court (see People v. Neely, ante, p. 877 [26 Cal.Rptr.2d 189, 864 P.2d 460]), petitioner Charles Frederick Neely filed the petition for writ of habeas corpus which gave rise to the present proceeding. This petition, in part reiterating petitioner’s contentions on appeal, alleged, among other claims, that numerous failings by his trial counsel deprived petitioner of his right to the effective assistance of counsel. Concluding that the petition stated a prima facie claim for relief, we issued an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. FryeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. FairbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re AvenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API