Legal Opinion

Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided March 19, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. On exceptions to master’s report. In re intervening petitions of Theodore Gilman and Charles H. Bull, .trustees; Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railway Company; George I. Seney, trustee, and St. Joseph & St. Louis Railroad Company.

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

These are three intervening petitions, in each of which is presented the question of liability for rentals during the receivership. The master denied the petitions, exceptions were duly taken, and the question is now before us on these exceptions. The first two cases are so nearly alike that the statement of the facts in one will bring the question clearly before us. In August, 1879, the Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad Company leased its road to the Wabash Railroad Company for a period of 99 years. By subsequent consolidations the Wabash Railway Company became merged into the Wabash, St.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miltenberger v. Logansport Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Woodruff v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Commonwealth v. Franklin InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. In re MerrifieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  2. Ames v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1894
  3. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. New York Security & Trust Co. v. Louisville, E. & St. L. Consol. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1900
  5. Clyde v. Richmond & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API