Legal Opinion

Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2002No. 3893Published

1Opinion of the Court

809 A.2d 204 (2002)

Sid BURSTEIN and Doreen Burstein, H/W, Appellees,

v.

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 29, 2001.

Decided July 17, 2002.

Reargument Denied September 26, 2002.

Charles W. Craven, Philadelphia, for Prudential Property Casualty Insurance Company.

Christine P. Busch, James C. Haggerty, Philadelphia, for Pennsylvania Defense Institute.

Milton J. Frank, Philadelphia, for Sid and Doreen Berstein.

Dale G. Larrimore, Philadelphia, for Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association.

Before: FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API