Legal Opinion

Bowers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 9, 2010No. 1-09-0385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald Smith

Plaintiff Clarence Bowers appeals from an order of the circuit court dismissing with prejudice his complaint against defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In this case, we are called upon to determine whether plaintiff sufficiently stated a claim that State Farm’s employment of staff counsel to represent its insured in litigation gives rise to a cause of action for the unauthorized practice of law such that it could withstand a motion to dismiss under section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 2008)).

In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Burger King Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Canel v. TopinkaIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Corti v. FleisherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. SperryIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gunthorp v. GolanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seip v. Rogers Raw Materials Fund, L.P.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Delatorre v. Safeway Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Cooney v. MagnaboscoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Asian Human Services Family Health Center, Inc. v. Asian Human Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  5. Cooney v. MagnaboscoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API