Appalachian Land Co. v. EQT Production Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentAbramson, J.
I respectfully dissent. Pursuant to Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure (CR) 76.87(1), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit certified the following question of Kentucky law:
Does Kentucky’s “at the well” rule allow a natural-gas processor to deduct all severance taxes paid at market prior to calculating a contractual royalty payment based on “the market price of gas at the well,” or does the resource’s at-the-well price include a proportionate share of the severance taxes owed such that a processor may deduct only that portion of the severance taxes attributable to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shawnee Telecom Resources, Inc. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Poplar Creek Development Co. v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Kilmer v. Elexco Land Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.