Legal Opinion

Kilmer v. Elexco Land Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 2010No. 63 MAP 2009PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

The case at bar concerns the proper construction of the term “royalty” as it is used in the Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act (“GMRA”), 58 P.S. § 33, which governs, inter alia, leases between Pennsylvania landowners and gas companies seeking to drill natural gas wells into Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale deposits. As developed below, the GMRA requires that leases guarantee the landowner-lessor “at least one-eighth royalty of all oil, natural gas or gas of other designations removed or recovered from the subject real property.” 58 P.S. § 33. 1 Although the critical term…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merlini Ex Rel. Merlini v. Gallitzin Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Garman v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Bice v. Petro-Hunt, L.L.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Iams v. Carnegie Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  5. Kropa v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Forest Resources, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Board of Revision of Taxes, City of Philadelphia v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Patrick D. Leggett v. EQT Production Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Kropa v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Cunningham Prop. Mgmt. Trust v. Ascent Res. - Utica, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API