Legal Opinion

Memphis Bank and Trust Co. v. Garner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Chief Justice.

Appellee paid under protest and sought recovery of the local bank excise tax for the years 1977 and 1978. It contended that the taxing statute was unconstitutional and unenforceable insofar as it required inclusion of interest on federal obligations in measuring the tax. The Chancellor allowed recovery, holding that the state statute was contrary to federal exemption statutes, such as 31 U.S.C. § 742, and to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. 1 Finding no such conflict, we reverse and dismiss the action.

The decision of the Chancellor was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Educational Films Corp. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. MacAllen Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Pacific Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Miller v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First American National Bank of Knoxville v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Smith v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. KarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API