Legal Opinion

Pacific Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 11, 1932No. 270PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This case is here on appeal, Jud. Code § 237, from a judgment of the Supreme Court of California, denying *488recovery of a tax paid by appellant, a California corporation, for the privilege of doing business within the state, and exacted .under a statute1 alleged to be in contravention of the contract clause, Art. I, § 10, of the Federal Constitution. 212 Cal. 148. The annual tax is, for domestic corporations, a\ specified percentage of the net income of the corporation for the next preceding fiscal or calendar year. By § 7 of the statute, net income is defined as “ gross income ” less certain…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  3. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API