Coultress v. City of San Antonio
Texas Supreme Court
On rehearing. Denied, and former opinion affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.
In this action, for mandamus only, we are not called upon to decide, and have not undertaken to determine, and do not decide, whether any of the decisions of the several Courts of Civil Appeals in City of Houston v. Albers, 32 Tex. Civ. App. 70, 73 S. W. 1085, City of Paris v. Cabiness, 44 Tex. Civ. App. 587, 98 S. W. 925, and City of San Antonio v. Coultress, 169 S. W. 918, was correct. The real and only issue before us is, Does the decision in said Coultress Case conflict, upon any question of law, with either of said other decisions? And that defines the full extent of our jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- City of San Antonio v. BodemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- City of Paris v. CabinessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Smith v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Houston v. AlbersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
- McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Abilene v. McMahanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Nolan v. WitkowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Ed Grote v. Chief Justice P.R. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.