Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Cochran
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. cited: Delaney v. Lindel', 22 Neb., 280; Mateer v. Missouri P. R. Co., 16 S. ~W. Rep. [Mo.], <839; Hinkle v. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co., 31 Minn., 434; Gulliher v. Chicago, R. L. & P. R. Co., 13 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 431; Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Shay, 82 Pa.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. cited: Delaney v. Lindel', 22 Neb., 280; Mateer v. Missouri P. R. Co., 16 S. ~W. Rep. [Mo.], <839; Hinkle v. Minneapolis & St. L. R. Co., 31 Minn., 434; Gulliher v. Chicago, R. L. & P. R. Co., 13 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 431; Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Shay, 82 Pa. St., 202; Snider v. Adams Express Co., 63 Mo., 383; Wallace v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co., 25 N. "W. Rep. [Ia.], 772; Gould v. Cayuga County Nat. Bank, 86 N. Y , 84; Glenn v. Statler, 42 Ia., 109 ; Butman v. Hussey, 30 Me., 263; Moorman v. Collier, 32 Ia.,…
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
The plaintiff below (defendant in error) recovered in an action against the defendant below in the district court for Lancaster county, and which judgment is presented.to this court for review by the petition in error of the defendant railroad company. In his petition the plaintiff below alleges that on the 11th day of May, 1888, while in the service of the defendant company, and by means of its negligence and default, he suffered serious personal injuries; that on the 3d day of September following he made a settlement with said defendant, whereby, in consideration of the sum of $100 in hand…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walter Bros. v. Reed & GerardNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
- Lexington Mill & Elevator Co. v. NeuensNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Reynolds v. Burlington & Missouri River RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carter White Lead Co. v. KinlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Wood, Curtis & Co. v. SeurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Hale v. SheehanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Bodtke v. BrattenNebraska Supreme Court · 1958