Elizabeth G. Austin v. United States of America, James E. Holshouser, United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentHaynsworth, Circuit Judge
(dissenting) .
I think the District Judge properly deferred consideration of these questions and refused to enjoin presentation of information to the grand jury. The questions, difficult at best, will certainly arise in a much more intelligible context after the grand jury shall have acted and it has become known whether Mrs. Austin, or any of the persons for whom she prepared income tax returns, will be indicted, and, if indicted, for what offenses. In the meanwhile, an order suppressing for all purposes information in the possession of the District Attorney would seem to me to be an…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.