Legal Opinion

Tarbell v. Bomes

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 13, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

This was an action of assumpsit to recover plaintiff’s commission as a broker. After a jury’s verdict for defendant, plaintiff brings the case here on exceptions to the action of the trial court in refusing to direct a verdict for plaintiff or to grant plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff’s present contention is that on the evidence most favorable to defendant, plaintiff is entitled to a directed verdict.

Defendant employed plaintiff to sell certain real estate for 3% commission, payable “upon delivery of the deed and payment of the consideration”. Plaintiff procured a customer, one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pinkerton v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. Myers v. BuellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  4. Wright v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  5. Glade v. FordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Palace Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Prince George's Country Club, Inc. v. Edward R. Carr, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Bradford Dyeing Assoc. v. J. Stog Tech GmbHSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. Bloom v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Levy v. Industrial National Bank of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API