Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Klamath County School District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1999No. Agency No. 93-13776 CA A98297Published

1Opinion of the Court

974 P.2d 705 (1999)

158 Or. App. 464

In the Matter of the Compensation of Glenn E. Whitlock, Claimant.

Glenn E. WHITLOCK, Petitioner,

v.

KLAMATH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent.

Agency No. 93-13776; CA A98297.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted April 7, 1998.

Resubmitted December 9, 1998.

Decided February 17, 1999.

Sean Lyell, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Ralph E. Wiser, III, and Bennett, Hartman, Reynolds & Wiser.

Elliot C. Cummins, McMinnville, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cummins, Goodman, Fish & Platt.

Before DEITS, Chief…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Fuls v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Whitlock v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Bank of Newport v. WagesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API