Legal Opinion

In Re Stanridge

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1937No. Civ. No. 1577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

By means of a writ of habeas corpus the petitioner seeks to be released from custody on the ground that the committing magistrate exceeded his jurisdiction in holding him for trial in the superior court after a preliminary examination upon a charge of resisting a public officer in the discharge of his duties contrary to the provisions of section 148 of the Penal Code. It is contended the preliminary examination discloses no evidence that the petitioner was . aware of the fact that the persons were public officers who were threatened with bodily injuries if they attempted to enforce an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re BocciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. McCrorySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. People ex rel. Posner v. VollmerNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. SernaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API