John Depauw v. U.S. International Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner John DePauw contends that his removal for unacceptable performance by respondent U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC or agency) was grounded in inadequate performance standards, and unsupported by either the evidence before the arbitrator (who upheld the agency’s action) or by the arbitrator’s own decision. We affirm.
I
Mr. DePauw was employed in 1970 by the then Tariff Commission (later, the ITC) as a commodity-industry analyst, grade GS-11. After three months he was promoted to GS-12, and the agency considered his performance satisfactory through September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cornelius v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roy L. Schapansky v. Department of Transportation, FaaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Albert J. Lovshin v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Barry L. Hale and Judson B. Hudson v. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Mary L. Wilson v. Department of Health and Human Services, Etc., Sidney C. Jackson v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- David C. Rogers, Sr. And the Overseas Education Association v. Department of Defense Dependents Schools, Germany RegionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Francis M. Fiorillo v. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- George E. Eibel v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Salmon v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Francis M. Fiorillo v. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.