Arnouville v. Crowe
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentMcDONALD, J.
hln affirming the trial court judgments, the majority concludes that the plaintiffs’ instant state court suit was not prescribed, because their earlier-filed federal suit remained pending when the plaintiffs filed the instant suit, and the federal suit served to interrupt prescription for as long as it remained pending. I respectfully believe this conclusion is wrong.
Prescription is interrupted when the ob-ligee commences action against the obligor in a court of competent jurisdiction and venue. If an action is commenced in an incompetent court, or in an improper venue, prescription is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Home Builders Ass'n of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Jennifer Gasch and Tammy Gasch, as Next Friend to Z.G., a Minor v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Karen FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Glasgow v. PAR MINERALS CORP.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Printworks, Inc. v. Dorn Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994