Metz v. Hicklin
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*517The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This was an action in mandamus to compel the delivery by officers of the proceeds of property sold upon execution to satisfy a judgment. Hettie Metz sued O. P. Hicklin, marshal of the city court of Wichita, and B. L. Bayman, clerk of that court, alleging that she had recovered a judgment against H. L. Oliver, which had not been paid; that an execution had been issued thereon and placed in the hands of the marshal; that he had levied on a crop of growing, wheat and made a sale of the same for $440, but had failed to turn over to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Treptow v. BuseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Cates v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Ramsey v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Walker v. BradenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- City of Kansas City v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Proto v. Missoula CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Simmons v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Howard v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Stewart & Horton Trust Account v. AutrandNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Larned Production Credit Ass'n v. E & E FeedingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.