Legal Opinion

Davis v. Graviss

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

672 S.W.2d 928 (1984)

Sandra L. DAVIS (now Litten), Appellant,

v.

George GRAVISS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

May 31, 1984.

J. Leonard Rosenberg, Cecil Davenport, Hanish, Davenport, Rosenberg & Weiner, Louisville, for appellant.

William S. Bowman, Leslie M. Murray, Stiles & Bowman, Louisville, for appellee.

LEIBSON, Justice.

The issue is whether the Court of Appeals erred in setting aside the verdict in this case as excessive. From our review of the record we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that the Court of Appeals' standard for review was…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Davis v. GravissKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Schwegel v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Rogers v. KasdanKentucky Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API