Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Woodbury County

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1984No. Nos. 83-2026, 83-2107PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

George Raymond Daniels and other applicants for general relief assistance in Woodbury County, Iowa brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging, inter alia, that the administration of the general relief program violated the applicants’ procedural due process rights. The defendants are Woodbury County, the Woodbury County Board of Supervisors, and an individual caseworker and her supervisor. The district court1 granted the plaintiffs partial relief holding that defendants had violated the applicants’ due process rights. The court enjoined further due process…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Michael A. Costantino, on Behalf of the Class of v. Trw, Inc. Jake Schoepler, Secretary, Board of Administrators Trw Salaried Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Lila M. Mallette v. Arlington County Employees' Supplemental Retirement System II Arlington County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Kapps v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Kapps v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Wilfred Keyes, and Congress of Hispanic Educators, Plaintiffs/intervenors-Appellees v. School District No. 1, Denver, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API