Legal Opinion
Kapps v. Wing
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 4, 2005No. Docket Nos. 03-9117-cv(L), 04-1271-cv(CON)PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge.
Defendants appeal from the judgment of the district court (Gershon, /.) granting plaintiffs partial summary judgment, and entering an award of declaratory and in-junctive relief. The district court based its judgment on findings that, in the administration of New York’s Home Energy Assistance Program (“HEAP”), defendants violated the procedural requirements of the federal Due Process Clause, and the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Act (“the LIHEAA” or “the Act”). See Kapps v. Wing, 283 F.Supp.2d 866 (E.D.N.Y.2003). We conclude that plaintiffs’ due process arguments…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Davis v. BligeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Cushman v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Kapps v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Christopher Holly v. D. WoolfolkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Handberry v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.