State of Arizona v. Gregory Charles Rhome
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
¶ 1 Gregory Rhome was convicted by a jury of first-degree failure to appear in connection with a felony. On appeal, he argues the trial court made various erroneous rulings and that insufficient evidence supported the jury’s verdict. Because we agree the evidence was insufficient, we vacate Rhome’s conviction and sentence.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 Rhome failed to appear for a scheduled hearing in connection with a criminal charge in October 2012. He was charged and convicted as noted above, and sentenced to an enhanced prison term of eight years. We have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CarreonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020