Legal Opinion

Mittnacht v. Montana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

An easement of way created by grant is not extinguished in such facile modes as are those which arise by prescription, user or necessity. The plaintiff’s predecessor in title was granted by an indenture, in which the then adjoining owner was grantor, a conveyance of an easement, to wit, a right of way running from the rear yard of his premises to the sidewalk on Spring street, New York, through defendant’s building. The way is referred to throughout the indenture as an “ alley or gangway,” and the covenant for its use in the instrument reads, after describing its site, width,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roby v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Haight v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Arnold v. . FeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Heughes v. Galusha Stove Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zubli v. Community Mainstreaming Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Finch v. Unity Fee Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Wood v. SimonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Ribellino v. 110 Fifth Street Private, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Ribellino v. 110 Fifth Street Private, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API