Legal Opinion

Finch v. Unity Fee Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 6, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action is brought under the provisions of section 473 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 210-214 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a judgment declaring the rights of the various parties under a certain restrictive covenant affecting a portion of the plaintiffs’ premises. From a judgment in their favor this appeal is taken.

The situation of the various parcels of property involved in the controversy herein can best be understood by reference to the diagram on page 433.

Robert Burns, in 1857, became the owner of parcels A, D and E. The property was on the west side of Sixth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roby v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Haight v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Jenks v. PawlowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Ocean City Ass'n v. ChalfantNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  5. Mittnacht v. MontanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Josh v. NobileNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Wood v. SimonNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Baldwinsville Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Burns Farms, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API