Legal Opinion

Price v. R & a SALES

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2002No. 84A04-0111-CV-508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Kenneth and Ruth Price (collectively “the Prices”) appeal the trial court’s grant of R &'A Sales’ motion to dismiss the Price’s negligence suit in which they sought damages for injuries sustained by Kenneth when he fell ón R & A’s property immediately after his employment had been terminated. The sole issue presented for review is whether the exclusive remedy provision under the Workers Compensation Act (“the Act”) deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to adjudicate the Prices’ claim.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On the morning of August…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Zygmuntowicz v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eagledale Enterprises, LLC v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Duck, Melissa v. Cox Oil Co.Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2015
  3. Duck, Melissa v. Cox Oil CompanyTennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API