Legal Opinion

Drake v. Connolly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1931No. 28,318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment. At the close of the evidence defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied.' The jury returned a verdict against her for $256; a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied, and the judgmefft appealed from was entered. There had been no motion for a new trial. No complaint is made as to the rulings on the admission or rejection of evidence or to the court’s charge.

Deféndant was the owner and operator of a beauty shop at Rochester, Minnesota. On March 29, 1928, plaintiff employed defendant to furnish a permanent wave for her hair.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amy v. Wallace-Robinson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Stahlberg v. MoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Williams v. Cass-Crow Wing Cooperative Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API