Legal Opinion
Stahlberg v. Moe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1969No. 41411PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion for a new trial and from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.
About 10:30 a. m. March 11, 1964, plaintiff, Mildred E. Stahlberg, entered Jim and Frank’s Beauty Salon, owned and operated by defendants, James A. Moe and James R. Lang, in White Bear Lake, to obtain a shampoo, haircut, cold-wave permanent, and tint rinse for her hair. She had patronized the shop since the fall of 1963 and defendants’ records showed she had received a permanent there in December 1963. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Gardner v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Johnson v. West Fargo Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Johnson v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Silver v. RedleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- In Re Viagra Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Willert v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.