Legal Opinion

Staples v. White, Handley & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM MORGAN. Appeal from Chancery Court of Morgan County.II. It. Gibson, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtLukton, J.

As to strangers to a pending suit, the constructive notice of Us pendens, where only such notice is relied upon, begins with the service of the subpoena upon the material defendants to the suit pending. Tharpe v. Dunlap, 4 Heis., 674; Williamson v. Williams, 11 Lea, 363. It is not, however, essential, where the notice of Us pendens is pleaded or relied upon in answer, that it shall be averred that the subpoena had been served at the time the complainant had acquired an interest in the property involved in the pending litigation. This fact must, however, be shown, for the Us pendens only…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowe v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. Pyott Land & Mining Co. v. TarwaterTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Harris v. BeasleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bank of Delrose v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API