Legal Opinion

Warren Telephone Co. v. Hakala

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1957No. 1385PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s telephone system was damaged by defendant colliding with one of its poles. Defendant admits liability.

The question presented involves the proper measure of damages to which plaintiff is entitled.

The plaintiff’s direct cost for labor and materials in making the necessary repairs was $57.78. In addition thereto plaintiff has computed its indirect cost of mailing such repairs, said computation amounting to $53.67.

The method used by plaintiff in determining the indirect cost of repairs was to use a percentage of the direct cost of labor and materials, which percentage was based upon…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. S & D Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Enting Water Conditioning Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. BeardConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
  4. Ohio Power Co. v. JohnstonHancock County Court of Common Pleas · 1968
  5. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. HinterlongHamilton County Municipal Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API