Bradford v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentJustice Cothran
(dissenting) : I do not agree with the conclusions announced in the opinion of the- Chief Justice in this case, and propose, respectfully, to state the grounds of my dissent.-
The action is for $25,000.00 damages on account of personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, resulting from a fall in the store of the defendant company, due as alleged to her slipping upon the oiled floor of the store which she had entered as a customer.
Upon the-trial before his Honor, Judge Dennis, and a jury, at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony the defendants moved for a nonsuit, which was refused; at the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Stearns v. Ontario Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Spickernagle v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.