Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bradford v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 15, 1927No. 12289Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I do not agree with the conclusions announced in the opinion of the- Chief Justice in this case, and propose, respectfully, to state the grounds of my dissent.-

The action is for $25,000.00 damages on account of personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, resulting from a fall in the store of the defendant company, due as alleged to her slipping upon the oiled floor of the store which she had entered as a customer.

Upon the-trial before his Honor, Judge Dennis, and a jury, at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony the defendants moved for a nonsuit, which was refused; at the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Stearns v. Ontario Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Spickernagle v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API