Legal Opinion
DiFlorio v. Van Slyke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1996No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, amended complaint against defendants David F. Van Slyke and Mint Condition Auto Sales, Inc., reinstated and cross motion granted. Memorandum: While on duty as a Deputy Sheriff in Onondaga County, plaintiff Daniel A. DiFlorio, Sr., sustained injuries when a disabled vehicle he was assisting was struck by a station wagon operated by defendant David Van Slyke and owned by defendant Mint Condition Auto Sales, Inc. (Mint Condition). Before striking the disabled vehicle, which partially blocked traffic in the passing lane of an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Santangelo v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Barraza v. SambadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dubois v. VanderwalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Said v. AssaadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- D'Arpa v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Castro v. TrostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Ledoux v. ManittaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.