Legal Opinion

State v. Anthony

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 843SC710Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant argues under her first assignment of error that the four indictments on which she was tried are defective. She says this is so because each of the indictments fails to allege that the defendant’s representations deceived School Plans, Inc. or that the merchandise was obtained as a direct result of the misrepresentation of the identity of the defendant. The indictments allege the property was obtained “by means of a false pretense which was calculated to deceive and did deceive” and “[t]he false pretense consisted of the following: the defendant received and accepted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. TesenairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API