Murray v. George E. Failing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.
In this diversity suit the appellants-plaintiffs sued the appellees-defendants for personal injuries resulting from the defendants’ negligence. The district court sustained the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Oklahoma Workers’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Horwitz Iron & Metal Co. v. MylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Maxville v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murray v. George Failing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985