Legal Opinion

Murray v. George E. Failing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 20, 1985No. 84-2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.

In this diversity suit the appellants-plaintiffs sued the appellees-defendants for personal injuries resulting from the defendants’ negligence. The district court sustained the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Oklahoma Workers’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. W. P. Atkinson Enterprises, Inc. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  4. Horwitz Iron & Metal Co. v. MylerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Maxville v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murray v. George Failing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API