Legal Opinion

Mason v. Perry

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 16, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Bill in Equíty to avoid a trust.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

The questions presented for ’our decision in this case arise out of the thirteenth clause of the will of Samuel N. Amsbury, late of Providence, R. I., deceased. Said clause is as follows :

! ‘ Thirteenth. All the rest, residue, and remainder of my property, real, personal, and mixed, of which I shall die seized and possessed, or to which I shall be entitled at the time of my decease, wheresoever situated and howsoever described, including what shall remain after payment of the foregoing legacies, of my deposits in banks, my corporate stocks, and my notes and mortgages (the bank-books,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hibernian Benevolent Society v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Old South Society v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Grand MasterIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Coit v. ComstockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Estate of SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Goetz v. Old National Bank of MartinsburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gibson v. Frye InstituteTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re Long's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API