Olsen v. Bank of Ephraim
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
This is an appeal, upon the judgment roll, from the district court of Sanpete county. The only error assigned is that the conclusions of law and judgment are not supported by and are contrary to the findings of fact. The facts are simple, though the findings are somewhat e¡x-tended and in detail. Since we are called upon to decide what the judgment should be under the facts as found by the court, it becomes necessary to set out the essentials of the findings of fact at some length. The exceptions to the conclusions of law and the judgment admit, for the purposes of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Walb Construction Co. v. ChipmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Belden v. SeymourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
- Kirkpatrick v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Miller v. MarckleIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Li v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020